FORM FOR Report ON THE MANUSCRIPT

Please mark with a SERIAL NUMBER if applicable

Ο          Topic suitable

            (1. Yes, 2. Marginal, 3. Not at all)

             Comments:

Ο          Information

            (1. Original, 2. Confirmatory, 3. Trivial/nonsense)

             Comments:

Ο          Academic value

            (1. Excellent, 2. Sound/partly sound, 3. Poor/doubtful)

             Comments:

Ο          Title

            (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

            Comments:

Ο          RUNNING HEAD:

            (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

             Comments:

Ο          KEYWORDS:

             (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. I Inadequate)

             Comments:

Ο          Abstract

            (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Minor revisions, 3. Inadequate/unclear)

            Comments:

Ο          INTRODUCTION

           (1. importance of studying of topic, 2. Convincing rationale of study, 3. Review of Literature on topic)

            Comments:

Ο          Data

            (1. Appropriate/Sufficiently large, 2. Appropriate but too limited, 3.Inappropriate)

            Comments:

Ο          Methods

            (1. Appropriate for aims, 2. Too simple, 3. Inappropriate/erroneous)

             Comments:

Ο          Discussion/conclusions/RECOMMENDATIONS

            (1. Correct/warranted by results, 2. Mainly correct 3. Wrong preliminary/speculative)

            Comments:

Ο          HEADINGS, SUBHEADINGS AND SUB-SUBHEADINGS

            (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

            Comments:

Ο          abbreviations

            (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

            Comments:

Ο          Statistical Symbols

            (1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

            Comments:

Ο          NOTES

            (1. Clear, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

            Comments:

Ο          References

            (1. Complete/adequate, 2. Sufficient, 3. Insufficient/partly irrelevant)

            Comments:

Ο          PHOTOGRAPH/GRAPH/MAP/CHART

             (1. Appropriate/excellent quality, 2. Adequate, 3. Poor quality/messy)

            Comments:

Ο          Tables

            (1. Appropriate/clearly presented, 2. Adequate, 3. Messy/inadequate number)

             Comments:

Ο          Language

Ο          (1. Correct grammar and style, 2. Minor corrections needed 3. Poor, needs major revision)

             Comments:

Ο          conclusion and recommendation to the Editors

Ο          Status of the paper

Ο          The paper is

Ο          Accepted

Ο          Acceptable After Minor Revision

Ο          Acceptable After Moderate Revision. No need to referee again

Ο          Acceptable After Substantial Revision. Needs to be re-referred

Ο          Rejected

Ο          Other

Ο          Finally Accepted /Rejected

HOME                                                                                                                                                         BACK